I thought unit building in AoS was simple
Dec 29, 2020 11:34:38 GMT -5
via mobile
Jack Shrapnel and onlurker like this
Post by dave on Dec 29, 2020 11:34:38 GMT -5
Sure, some units have options. Spears or maces? Two weapons, or a shield? But you make the choice for the unit, and everyone is equipped in the same way.
Enter tzaangors. So, first I decided to pick shields instead of two hand weapons. Ok fine, that's a decision made for the whole group. But then comes the special weapons. Now I get to upgrade 4 out of 10 to great weapons, and 2 out of 10 to dual wielding mutants. There is also a leader, a banner, and a musician to model.
What I ended up doing was a bit of converting to give my leader, musician, and banner bearer the great weapon upgrades. That leaves 1 normal great weapon dude, 2 dual wielding mutants, and 4 sword and shield users in a unit of 10.
Now however, I'm left with four different attack profiles to deal with in combat. Leader, great weapon, mutant, sword/shield.
I feel like adding a more elite unit to speed up my gameplay (instead of adding another 90 ungors) may have backfired. Who would have guessed tzeentch was the complicated path....
Enter tzaangors. So, first I decided to pick shields instead of two hand weapons. Ok fine, that's a decision made for the whole group. But then comes the special weapons. Now I get to upgrade 4 out of 10 to great weapons, and 2 out of 10 to dual wielding mutants. There is also a leader, a banner, and a musician to model.
What I ended up doing was a bit of converting to give my leader, musician, and banner bearer the great weapon upgrades. That leaves 1 normal great weapon dude, 2 dual wielding mutants, and 4 sword and shield users in a unit of 10.
Now however, I'm left with four different attack profiles to deal with in combat. Leader, great weapon, mutant, sword/shield.
I feel like adding a more elite unit to speed up my gameplay (instead of adding another 90 ungors) may have backfired. Who would have guessed tzeentch was the complicated path....
