|
Post by matthewbri on Feb 13, 2023 8:16:42 GMT -5
Hey everybody
Pigeon and I are sketching out the next tournament, and I was thinking a doubles tournament(I love the format). Time wise looking at late March early April.
1000 pnts a player with a 50% painted req.
Just was wondering thoughts on this before I lock it in. The tournament after this will be a full 3000 pointer some time in the summer.
|
|
|
Post by lightcavalier on Feb 13, 2023 12:55:52 GMT -5
Im 100% game for that
Even 1250 pts a person would be ok with me (HH has an intereting spot where when you scale over 2000 pts the game speeds up because stuff starts dying)
How would the allies rules factor in to this? (ie do forces intermingle as per the chart, or will we just set it to one relationship IOT avoid power combos)
How will reaction allotment work? (one per phase per team, or one per phase per player, etc)
|
|
|
Post by Temporary Omegon on Feb 13, 2023 13:37:19 GMT -5
Would there be any adjustment to the force org chart? HH is pretty unbalanced at those points levels. Additionally, how would warlord traits and allies work? I feel like unless you work closely with your doubles partner to coordinate your list it will be quite difficult to build a list that is able to deal with everything at these point levels.
|
|
|
Post by lightcavalier on Feb 13, 2023 14:08:49 GMT -5
Would there be any adjustment to the force org chart? HH is pretty unbalanced at those points levels. Additionally, how would warlord traits and allies work? I feel like unless you work closely with your doubles partner to coordinate your list it will be quite difficult to build a list that is able to deal with everything at these point levels. If everyone is operating under the same constraints, it does limit just how much you would have to plan for
|
|
|
Post by chrisallen on Feb 13, 2023 22:10:23 GMT -5
Perhaps limiting the two players to the same shared force org. That way you don't get bloody or accuse in any one area.
|
|
|
Post by distractedcarnifex on Feb 14, 2023 20:53:06 GMT -5
Teams might be an obstacle to new players? They would have to know someone.
|
|
|
Post by question on Feb 14, 2023 21:25:25 GMT -5
Good point.
|
|
|
Post by artonas on Feb 14, 2023 21:34:30 GMT -5
What about random pairings? Two random loyalist get paired and two random traitors get paired
|
|
|
Post by lightcavalier on Feb 15, 2023 5:29:19 GMT -5
What about random pairings? Two random loyalist get paired and two random traitors get paired The ruinous powers approve
|
|
|
Post by kalen on Feb 16, 2023 10:44:42 GMT -5
We could just do solos aslo 😁
|
|
|
Post by kalen on Feb 16, 2023 10:46:52 GMT -5
I’ll play what ever though, heresy is my favourite
|
|
|
Post by trevor1988 on Feb 18, 2023 21:57:28 GMT -5
I like the idea of random pairings for each round. I think we could push it to 1500pts each with 1HQ and 1 Troop compulsory.
|
|
|
Post by ohgodsnakes on Feb 18, 2023 22:31:59 GMT -5
I'm going to a random pairings tournament in late March that is using the Zone Mortalis force org. Not the rules, just the chart.
|
|
|
Post by distractedcarnifex on Feb 20, 2023 20:57:46 GMT -5
I'm going to a random pairings tournament in late March that is using the Zone Mortalis force org. Not the rules, just the chart. I just took a look at Zone Mortalis (I think), and using that Force Org with random pairings could really give us a different experience while encouraging new players.
|
|
|
Post by lightcavalier on Feb 26, 2023 5:29:22 GMT -5
Any idea on what the date for this will be?
|
|