|
Post by voodoo on Apr 10, 2015 8:49:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Jack Shrapnel on Apr 10, 2015 8:52:48 GMT -5
little big for the walker I think...looks almost IK sized.... but kind of a cool model... EDIT: now if those rules were how IK were played, I don't think there'd be near the complaints about them
|
|
|
Post by voodoo on Apr 10, 2015 10:58:39 GMT -5
I'd be more ok with this guys rules if it was a vehicle not an MC. T8, 2+/4++ with 4 wounds is pretty hateful considering the weaponry it's packing. In all reality, with the weaponry on board it looks like a knight hunter, it's durable enough to get into combat and beat the stuffing out of one.
|
|
|
Post by Jack Shrapnel on Apr 10, 2015 11:05:51 GMT -5
unless it gets D-slapped first given it's I2 also looks pretty feeble in combat really with two attacks... so I'm not sure it's beating up anybody... I think a Wraithknight is better (and cheaper) but isn't that always the case?
|
|
|
Post by thesanityassassin on Apr 10, 2015 12:05:56 GMT -5
Or things like Grav show up, or bladestorming Eldar, or Dark Eldar in general. Lots of stuff that can maul things with a toughness value and not really damage a Superheavy Walker at all.
|
|
|
Post by voodoo on Apr 10, 2015 13:12:49 GMT -5
All true points... Not sure how I missed the I2. So it may not be as good at wrecking knights as I’d thought; however, knights having a toughness value makes about zero sense. Same as a warhound or dreadnought having toughness vs/ armor.
|
|