|
|
Post by silverwhasp on Feb 15, 2023 11:28:08 GMT -5
The clarifications are good. I didn't completely understand the problem until I've read it 6 times and had it explained to me 3 times. I now more clearly understand the issue and voted. Many thanks to all that participated in this conversation! I think it is a very mature and adult thing to be able to discuss these kinds of things in an open matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by thatguythere on Feb 15, 2023 11:46:40 GMT -5
I don't really have a dog in this fight, as I'm not in Club Champs.
But I'm going to ring in to say the amicable way the community is seeking an equitable resolution to a corner case rule, before it comes up in game, is heartening.
I was legit nervous to play any matches even a little 'competitive' in the 40k universe, given what I'd seen from online communities around the game. I was pretty happy collecting and building Nids playing against one guy.
But you're all making it very clear that, in Kingston at least, the unpleasantness is a firm outlier, and there's a friendly atmosphere around even contentious issues.
|
|
|
|
Post by connor on Feb 15, 2023 12:56:02 GMT -5
Voting for cap at 6. Every other version of this rule does and it feels like an oversight on GWs part.
Im bringing guard and will still include a unit of Krsrkins, because for 100pts they still make things dead and that's good value.
If we did make a more universal ruling of no unit can ever deal more than 6 MWs in a single attack I'd be ok with that, if guard players are feeling unjustly targeted
|
|
|
|
Post by Hi I'm Derek on Feb 15, 2023 13:03:01 GMT -5
But you're all making it very clear that, in Kingston at least, the unpleasantness is a firm outlier, and there's a friendly atmosphere around even contentious issues. Let me tell you- it was all learned from hard-earned experience. It's like safety regs, inked in blood. Shannon could tell you stories I'm sure of the late 7th era formations dumpster fire years lol. In this case I think people seem to be surprised by the reaction this particular combo is getting despite it's apparent lack of competitive dominance, but it's more... the spirit of the thing? People are very split on whether this is a case of an obvious bug that will be patched out of the game in short order. Basically everyone is reading the bones differently  And in answer to the question of 'why now, why this unit' I imagine many would say a policy approach to pre-FAQ books is pretty overdue. But with all that said I have no dog in this fight so I'm not voting, although I do think it's worth mulling over a way to avoid this in future. |
|
|
|
Post by Jack Shrapnel on Feb 15, 2023 13:06:28 GMT -5
yes, after clubs we will have a discussion about pre-FAQ codexes for sure.
I also did not vote as I am not guaranteed to even be able to play (depends on numbers of course and the dreaded day prior/of drop outs) so I'm leaving it solely up to the community to decide and I'll happily abide with whatever all of you want to do.
|
|
|
|
Post by ohgodsnakes on Feb 15, 2023 17:02:48 GMT -5
The pole has almost as many votes as there are spelling and pronunciation variations for kasrkin!
|
|
|
|
Post by Typhus on Feb 15, 2023 17:21:09 GMT -5
The pole has almost as many votes as there are spelling and pronunciation variations for kasrkin! That's pretty krassrkin of you to point out. |
|
|
|
Post by Jack Shrapnel on Feb 15, 2023 17:27:21 GMT -5
The pole has almost as many votes as there are spelling and pronunciation variations for kasrkin! half of the spelling mistakes are me correcting my spelling of the unit after someone spells it a different way lol you weird imperials need chaos names instead! |
|
|
|
Post by cmcd on Feb 15, 2023 17:52:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by voodoo on Feb 15, 2023 19:53:38 GMT -5
The pole has almost as many votes as there are spelling and pronunciation variations for kasrkin! I'm wondering if you spelled "poll" incorrectly on purpose here as a troll or if it was a legit fat fingering of a keyboard... |
|
|
|
Post by kaelon on Feb 16, 2023 0:32:00 GMT -5
AUTOCORRECT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(fist held high in the air shaking violently)
|
|
|
|
Post by harryf on Feb 16, 2023 19:06:28 GMT -5
Fairly sure I know the answer to this but just to be sure:
The 6 MW cap only applies to the Overcharged Las Cells stratagem right?
(I ask because I'm running hot-shot marksman rifles, which generates MWs on wound rolls of 6s even without the stratagem)
|
|
|
|
Post by voodoo on Feb 16, 2023 19:10:31 GMT -5
Fairly sure I know the answer to this but just to be sure: The 6 MW cap only applies to the Overcharged Las Cells stratagem right? (I ask because I'm running hot-shot marksman rifles, which generates MWs on wound rolls of 6s even without the stratagem) lol, how to show which way you voted without saying which way you voted. |
|
|
|
Post by harryf on Feb 16, 2023 19:15:21 GMT -5
Fairly sure I know the answer to this but just to be sure: The 6 MW cap only applies to the Overcharged Las Cells stratagem right? (I ask because I'm running hot-shot marksman rifles, which generates MWs on wound rolls of 6s even without the stratagem) lol, how to show which way you voted without saying which way you voted. What does it matter? A decision's been made, I'm just asking to clarify |
|
|
|
Post by silverwhasp on Feb 16, 2023 20:12:53 GMT -5
lol, how to show which way you voted without saying which way you voted. What does it matter? A decision's been made, I'm just asking to clarify From what I understand the 6 MW's cap is for the stratagem only. |
|
